New Streamlined Process Another Incentive for State Voluntary
Cleanups
October 2005
View or download the PDF version of this Alert.
State legislators and lobbyists across the country will likely be
keeping a close eye on new guidelines developed by state and federal
environmental regulators in Pennsylvania to streamline the process for
meeting cleanup requirements for polluted former industrial sites. The
new streamlined process implemented by the Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (DEP) will allow developers to simultaneously
satisfy their obligations under Pennsylvania’s Land Recycling Program —
the Land Recycling and Environmental Remediation Standards Act (Act 2),
35 P.S. §§ 6026.101-6026.908 — and three key federal laws: the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6987; the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA
or superfund), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675; and the Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2629. The success or failure of these
guidelines will likely determine whether there will be a push in other
states to follow Pennsylvania’s lead.
State Voluntary Cleanup Programs
|
“The new streamlined process implemented by the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) will
allow developers to simultaneously satisfy their obligations
under Pennsylvania’s Land Recycling Program...and three key
federal laws...” |
|
State voluntary cleanup programs represent one of the few “everybody
wins” solutions in environmental law. For many years, contamination at
abandoned, idled or underused industrial and commercial facilities
hampered redevelopment of these sites, as developers were reluctant to
acquire them and lenders were loath to provide funding for them out of a
concern that they would be held liable for cleanup costs under superfund
and its state law analogs. Consequently, many of these facilities
remained dormant, resulting in a loss of jobs and tax revenue for local
communities.
To address these concerns and to encourage redevelopment of these
sites, many states created voluntary cleanup programs (VCP), which
provided incentives for brownfields redevelopment. The last formal
survey on the subject indicated that forty-four states now have VCPs.
These programs facilitate development and allow companies to improve
their financial condition by removing unproductive properties and
liabilities from their balance sheets.
While the types of sites and kinds of entities that may be eligible
for these programs vary from state to state, many of the incentives
provided by these programs overlap. The most common types of incentives,
along with representative states incorporating such incentives into
their programs, include:
- Releases from Liability: limitation on the potential liability
of prospective purchasers and developers by allowing them to enter
into agreements with state environmental authorities to perform a
cleanup in exchange for a covenant not to sue from the state (often
transferable to the lenders and successors of the purchasers and
developers) (AR, CA, CT, FL, ID, IL, IN, LA, ME, MA, MI, MN, MO, NH,
NJ, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI)
- Contribution Protection: contribution protection to prospective
purchasers and developers for response costs associated with
pre-existing contamination at the site (sometimes extends to toxic
tort and property damage liability as well) (DE, IL, MD, MO, NY, PA,
RI)
- Risk-Based Cleanup Standards: more appropriate cleanup standards
using risk-based cleanup standards, whereby prospective purchasers
and developers can design a remediation that will be based on the
risk posed by the site after taking into account the proposed use of
the property, rather than generic cleanup standards (AL, AZ, CO, CT,
FL, ID, IL, IN, MD, MN, MT, NJ, OH, OK, PA, RI, UT, VT, WI)
- Financial Assistance: grant or loan programs that may be used to
defray the costs of site investigation and remediation, or tax
incentives such as tax abatements (AR, CT, DE, FL, ID, IL, IN, MD,
MA, MI, MN, MO, NJ, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, TX, WA, WV)
- Streamlined Cleanup Procedures: streamlined cleanup procedures
and expedited agency reviews (AZ, CA, MA, MT, NH, PA, WA)
Pennsylvania’s New Streamlined Process
Issued in September 2005, Pennsylvania’s new VCP guidelines for
meeting cleanup requirements builds upon and expands the last of the
above-listed incentives: streamlining cleanup procedures.
In April 2004, DEP and the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) signed a historic Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), called
Pennsylvania’s One Cleanup Program, which made it possible for
developers to work toward meeting both state and federal cleanup
standards at the same time. The MOA can be found at
http://www.dep.state.pa.us/dep/deputate/airwaste/wm/landrecy/facts/EPAMOA.htm.
Previously, developers had to exert extra time and effort to comply
with separate requirements under the Act 2 portion of the state’s Land
Recycling Program and federal EPA standards. Now, most sites that enter
the One Cleanup Program only need to fulfill the state’s Act 2
requirements to meet their federal obligations, speeding up final
cleanup approval and hastening redevelopment.
The new VCP guidelines were adopted to implement the MOA. Key
features include: a lead project manager to serve as a single point of
contact for the client, simplification of process steps on most
projects, and much faster approvals. Notably, the process sets forth
three possible paths under which a project may proceed. The paths call
for varying degrees of EPA oversight and concurrence, depending on MOA
criteria and the level of contamination at the site. An abbreviated
process flowchart follows:

A more detailed flowchart and description of the new process can be
found
here.
The success of the new VCP guidelines will depend on a number of
factors, not the least of which are: cooperation among the developers,
EPA, and DEP, and fair and consistent application of the process by the
agencies. So far, 11 sites around the state are being remediated under
the MOA. The streamlined process undoubtedly evolved from agency
experience working on these sites. Only time will tell whether cleanup
requirements for future sites will be able to fit the mold derived from
this previous work. In the meantime, 49 states will be waiting, and
watching.
This Alert was written by
Brian G. Glass and
Stephen C. Jones in the
Philadelphia office. Please contact Mr. Glass or Mr. Jones at
215.988.7800 or your Greenberg Traurig liaison if you have any questions
regarding the subject matter of this Alert.
© 2005 Greenberg Traurig
Additional Information:
For more information, please review our Environmental Practice description, or
feel free to contact one of our attorneys.
This GT ALERT is issued for informational purposes only and is not intended
to be construed or used as general legal advice. Greenberg Traurig attorneys provide
practical, result-oriented strategies and solutions tailored to meet our clients’
individual legal needs.
|

|