January 7, 2009
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services Ombudsman’s Issues Report on
Use of E-verify in Arizona
On December 22, 2008, the U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
(USCIS) Ombudsman issued a report on the use of E-Verify in Arizona. The
purpose of the Ombudsman’s report was to explore how E-Verify has been
received by the private and public sector employers in Arizona and
determine how E-Verify might perform on a national basis if mandated by
immigration legislation.
From this study, the Ombudsman determined the following:
- As of December 4, 2008, more than 96,349 employers registered to
use E-Verify, which includes voluntary users and those required to
participate pursuant to state law (noting that 12 states made the
use of E-verify mandatory, including Arizona, Colorado, Georgia,
Idaho, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma,
Rhode Island, South Carolina and Utah).
- During fiscal year 2008, more than 6.6 million employment
verification queries were run by employers.
- According to the USCIS, through an independent research group (Westat),
more than 96 percent of E-Verify queries were processed within
twenty hours as work authorized.
- According to Westat, E-verify has a 99.5 percent accuracy rate
for correctly confirming work eligible employees.
- E-Verify is capable of accommodating up to 45,500 new employer
registrations per day and as many as 240 million employee specific
inquiries per year.
- Although the USCIS reports less than a 0.4 percent occurrence,
the most frequent concern reported by Arizona employers was the
issuance of Tentative Nonconfirmation (TNC) determinations on
work-authorized individuals.
- The Inspector General of the Social Security Administration
(SSA) found that the SSA’s database has an approximate plus/minus 4
percent error rate.
- The USCIS pre-mismatch typographical error check routine
implemented in September 2008, which prompts employers to
double-check the information entered in E-Verify, has reduced SSA
mismatches by as much as 30 percent.
The Ombudsman reported that although mid-sized and large employers
appeared relatively satisfied with the speed and accuracy of E-Verify,
smaller employers expressed concerns with user-friendliness. Employers
also expressed concern including access to E-Verify documentation and
the terminology within the documentation. In addition, employers
remained confused about the timing and specific processes that must be
followed upon the return of a TNC determination. Moreover, the Ombudsman
reported that USCIS outreach efforts may not be reaching smaller
employers, which represent approximately 50 percent of the existing
private U.S. payroll.
Based on these observations, the Ombudsman made the following
recommendations to the USCIS: (1) simplify the language used in all
E-Verify instructions and documentation; (2) make publicly available all
registration and operational documents; (3) ensure education and
outreach efforts reach small businesses; (4) implement a
tickler/calendar system in E-Verify that is capable of issuing timely
system prompts to employers to advise them of their next appropriate
steps for each specific open and unresolved TNC; and (5) announce as a
goal the intention to replace the current Form I-9 process for employers
that voluntarily use E-Verify.
|
|