April 24, 2009
Court Denies Rehearing in AZ Employer Sanctions Case
Amending its opinion of September 17, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit (“The Court”), denied the Plaintiff-Appellants’
petition for a rehearing or rehearing en banc in the case of CPLC v.
Napolitano, ordering that it will not accept any further petitions for
rehearing in the matter.
This litigation, filed by several community development and business
associations across multiple industries including Chicanos Por La Causa,
the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Arizona Farm Bureau Federation and the
Arizona Landscape Contractors Association, aimed to invalidate the Legal
Arizona Workers Act (LAWA) on Federal preemption grounds. LAWA
authorizes the Arizona state government to suspend or revoke the
business licenses of employers found to have knowingly hired
undocumented workers and makes the use of the Federal government’s
voluntary employment verification database program (E-Verify) mandatory
for all employers as of January 1, 2008. On September 17, 2008, the
Court held that the district court was correct in finding that Federal
immigration law did not preempt LAWA, and that it had properly
characterized it as a licensing measure within the state of Arizona’s
authority.
The Plaintiffs argued that the license suspension and revocation
sanctions imposed by LAWA impliedly conflicted with Federal immigration
law, namely, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA),
urging that the LAWA sanctions were harsher than IRCA’s provisions for
monetary sanctions, and that such sanctions would conflict with the
anti-discrimination intent of the IRCA by actually encouraging employer
discrimination. In the amendment to its opinion, the Court rejected this
argument, finding in part that “their argument is essentially
speculative . . . and we have no record reflecting the Act’s effect on
employers.”
To read more about the history of this litigation and LAWA, which grants
unprecedented immigration enforcement authority to a state, please see
our previous
GT Immigration Alert.
|
|