Greenberg Traurig, LLP  
     
 
HOME
BIOGRAPHIES
PRACTICE OVERVIEW
VISAS
COMPLIANCE & ENFORCEMENT
LINKS
CONGRESS
HUMAN RESOURCES
GLOBAL OUTBOUND IMMIGRATION
NEWSLETTER
NEWS FLASHES
LIBRARY
PROCESSING TIMES
CONTACT US

 

 

 

July/August 2008

>> Newsletter Home     >> July/August 2008     >> Article 7

Class Action Lawsuit Against USCIS Filed in California

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, on behalf of thousands of immigrant families whose children were wrongfully denied visas. The suit seeks to compel the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to issue the now-adult children visas in accordance with provisions of the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA).

Congress enacted CSPA to keep children, the derivative beneficiaries of their parents’ visa petitions, together with their families. Prior to CSPA, children who reached 21 years of age were no longer eligible to derive immigrant visas from a parent who was the principal beneficiary of an immigrant visa. This is because upon reaching 21, the adult children no longer qualified as “children” according to the definition of a child in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Section 3 of CSPA, codified as INA § 203(h)(3), remedied the problem by allowing children to automatically convert the visa petition and retain their parents’ earlier visa filing date, or “priority date.”

The suit alleges that although USCIS has granted some visa petitions pursuant to INA § 203(h)(3), there is no uniformity in the application of CSPA by the USCIS. The class action lawsuit seeks to compel USCIS to properly adjudicate all cases filed under CSPA, and uniformly comply with the requirement of allowing children to retain their parents’ original priority date in subsequent petitions field by the parents.

Copyright © 2001-2008 Greenberg Traurig All Rights Reserved.